Comparison between Traditional Surveying Methodologies And Hybrid Surveying Methodologies

Sy.no Traditional Surveying Methodologies Hybrid Surveying Methodologies
1.
A Gap had been created between records and ground reality with Traditional Survey Methodologies
The records are exactly matched with ground reality with hybrid Survey Methodologies
2.
Old types of equipment like Chain, Cross staff, prismatic compass, theodolite, etc. were being used and Outdated method results in Low level of accuracy.
Modern survey instruments like Total station, DGPS, Digital Level, etc., are used and results in better accuracy.
3.
Maps are in physical form and have difficulty in updating.
Maps are in digital form and easy to updation.
4.
Areas above a 10-degree slope can not be Surveyed.
Areas beyond a 10-degree slope can be surveyed without any restrictions.
5.
Loss of records due to negligence or natural causes.
All digitized maps, records will be stored in a permanent data base.
6.
Non-updating of cadastral maps reflecting the changes in land use/rights.
Updation of cadastral maps reflecting the changes in land use/rights.
7.
Traditional techniques are less accurate, more time-consuming, and not economical.
Availability of modern techniques which are more accurate, less time-consuming, and cost effective.
8.
Associated with human errors.
Maximum use of machines-errors due to human factors in survey and map preparation is negated.
9.
It reduces Transparency and if the topography of the place changes with time, it cannot be updated easily.
It increases Transparency and if the topography of the place changes with time, it can be updated easily.
10.
Maps are not easily portable and cannot be transported from one place to another.
Maps are easily portable as in digital format and can be transported from one place to another.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *