A path or cart track can affect field access, map interpretation and the extent recorded for a parcel. The survey record should capture what is supported by the ground and the controlling records; it should not create an ownership decision or an unsupported standard width.
Record the feature clearly
- Identify it as the feature shown by the records or actually used on the ground: for example, footpath, cart track, road or another described right of way.
- Measure the observed width at suitable locations and record the points where the feature enters, leaves or changes direction.
- Show reference marks, chainage and offsets in the FMB or survey sketch so a later survey can recover the geometry.
- Keep the description distinct from any statement about ownership, easement rights or compensation.
Compare the ground with records
- Check the current village map, FMB and the order or request that authorises the work.
- Walk the alignment with available interested parties where the procedure calls for it, and note their observations without treating agreement as a title decision.
- Record material differences between the existing record and the ground position.
- Refer a dispute about width, ownership, access or boundary through the competent revenue or survey process.
What not to assume
Do not automatically impose a fixed width, split a path equally between neighbouring holdings, or deduct area from a parcel merely because an old general rule is mentioned. Those actions require support in the applicable records, notification, rule or competent order.

Related tools: FMB bends distance calculator · links and feet converter

Corrections & questions
These guides are maintained for practising AP surveyors. If a step is outdated or wrong, tell us — we prioritise field corrections.
Comments are not stored on this page. The report form attaches this URL automatically.